Literature is not the
only source of mysteries, sometime tax and finance provide similar
stories. Except in many cases both the
reader and the characters are clueless.
Such is the case in the recently announced actions of New York Attorney
General Eric Schneiderman to investigate tax practices among hedge funds.
Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
|
The issue at hand is
whether or not the firms engaged in tax fraud by waiving their management
fees in return for a higher investment stake in firms they invested in, thus
turning the income into capital gains.
On the surface it appears
this is exactly what they are doing, in fact, it appears to be rather well
known.
Managers at a typical
private equity firm or hedge fund collect from their investors management fees
based on the size of the fund. But most of their compensation comes as a share
of the profits earned by the fund. The Internal Revenue Service allows those
profits to be considered “carried interest,” taxed at the capital gains rate
typically reserved for investments.
The tax strategy used
by Bain and other firms to convert management fees — the compensation normally
taxed as ordinary income — into capital gains is known as a “management fee
waiver.” The strategy is widely used within the industry: 40 percent of the 35
buyout firms based in the United
States surveyed in 2009 by Dow Jones said
their partners used at least some of the firm’s fees to make investments in
their funds.
As for the strategy
itself, it is clearly a violation of the tax laws, since the income from
the management fees is taxable income even if it is exchanged for higher
participation. (It would take a tax expert to fully explain all this,
fortunately The Dismal Political Economist is a tax expert. Even better, he is not going to explain
all this.) The fact that some hedge funds don’t do this
at all is proof enough that it is wrong. People that run these funds are the
greediest people in the world, if it were even potentially legal every fund
would be doing it.
So what’s the mystery?
It is this. Why is the Attorney
General of New York involved here. New York state is one
where there is no preferential treatment for capital gains. This means that the strategy has no effect on
New York taxes. And it is the Feds, not New York state that enforces federal tax
laws. In short there appears to be
absolutely no rationale for the Attorney General of New York to be involved.
To solve this mystery
we went to the end of the book to see ‘whodunit’. But unlike fiction, real life doesn’t have a
book, so we still do not know. On the
other hand we do know why the IRS is not on the case, too much political heat,
you know, attacking the wealth creators.
No comments:
Post a Comment