The Romney campaign
is partly built on the argument that Mr. Romney will balance the federal
budget, because deficit spending is bad and leads to a weaker economy. And of course there is the moral argument
about deficit spending, the implication being that people and governments that
have to borrow are bad, bad, bad.
So it is with some
amazement that it was just revealed that earlier this year the Romney campaign took
out a $20 million loan from a nice accommodating Washington bank to finance
their campaign when, amazing as it may seem, the Romney people were spending
more than they had.
Even as it bragged
about beating President Obama in fundraising over the summer, Mitt Romney’s
presidential campaign was so low on cash that it ended up engineering an
unusual $20 million loan to meet expenses until the former Massachusetts governor was formally named as
the Republican nominee in late August, officials disclosed Tuesday.
The loan from the Bank
of Georgetown, first reported Tuesday night by National Review Online and
confirmed by a senior campaign official, provides a telling glimpse into previously
unknown money troubles within the Romney camp over the summer. Romney has
relied heavily on wealthy donors but has had persistent difficulty raising
money among grassroots donors, who could have helped buoy his finances during
the long summer before the Republican convention in Tampa .
Now a large part of the problem here is somewhat ridiculous
election financing laws that prevent a candidate from using general election
contributions before the candidate is nominated. But note that even today the Romney campaign
has not paid off the loan.
The
campaign has paid back $9 million of the loan so far, with $11 million
remaining on the debt side of the ledger, the senior campaign official said.
and also note that unlike in 2008, Mr. Romney is not willing
to put a single dollar of his own considerable fortune into the campaign.
Romney,
who loaned more than $40 million of his fortune to his 2008 bid, has not given
his 2012 campaign any loans, officials said.
And while we have no reason why Mr. Romney has
refused to invest his own funds, it is pretty easy to speculate that the wife
and kids put their foot down, that they told Mr. Romney in no uncertain terms
that if he wanted to run he wasn’t doing it on their dime.
In the final act, none of this is really important as
far as the campaign is concerned.
Outside spending will mean that Mr. Romney far exceeds the Obama
campaign in funding ugly attack ads. And
regardless of the outcome of the election no one will really care who spent
what.
But the fact that Mr. Romney is willing to borrow
money says a lot about his principles or lack thereof, and the fact that yes,
he is willing to do anything or say anything to get elected.
No comments:
Post a Comment