It is of course,
impossible to read anything about the Jerry Sandusky/Penn State sexual
abuse case without feeling dirty all over. Mr. Sandusky is of course
likely to spend the rest of his life in jail, and hopefully even after his life
is over he will suffer torment. But
there are others involved besides Mr. Sandusky.
Two Penn State officials have
been charged in the case on issues involving a cover up of the crimes.
The two officials so charged moved to have the case tossed
out of court, and those actions were denied.
A judge on Wednesday
upheld perjury charges against two Penn
State administrators
accused of lying to a grand jury that investigated allegations ex-assistant
football coach Jerry Sandusky sexually abused children.
This Forum is more than willing to await a trial to
pass judgment on the officials. But what
is most disturbing is the other charge they are faced with, failure to report
child abuse. Again we can await the
judiciary proceedings, but everyone should think on this for a moment, or
hopefully longer.
The
perjury counts are felonies, while failure to report suspected child abuse is a
summary offense, less serious than a misdemeanor.
Think about that, failure to report child abuse in Pennsylvania does not
even rise to the level of seriousness as a misdemeanor. Is that really what Pennsylvanians want to
say about the horrific crime of child abuse?
Oh, and the defense of Mr. Schultz and Mr. Curley on
this charge.
The
judge did not rule on the other count they each face, failure to properly
report suspected child abuse. In that case, the defendants have argued the
statute of limitations has expired. The judge said that dismissal request would
be ruled on separately.
Get past the legalese and what Mr. Schultz and Mr. Curley
are saying is “Yeah, we may be guilty as charged but you didn’t catch us in
time so now you can’t charge us with the crime”. All this leaves one pretty significant
question, how does anyone, including themselves associate with these men?
No comments:
Post a Comment