George Gilder is one
of those long forgotten right wing wacko’s who often end up on the opinion
section of the Wall Street, where they can produce their silly thoughts without
fear of examination or condemnation, because nobody really pays attention to
them. But because everyone needs a little
comic relief after the Republican National Convention and during the Democratic
National Convention this Forum will briefly turn its attention to Mr. Gilder.
Who is George
Gilder? Well here is his brief
biography from
the WSJ piece.
Mr. Gilder is a founding fellow of the Discovery
Institute. His books include "Wealth and Poverty: A New Edition for the
Twenty-First Century" (Regnery, 2012).
As for hilarity, well try to savor this statement without
giggling uncontrollably.
In the perverse
feedback loops of "free," free health care comes to mean hypochondria,
illness caused by needless exams and treatments, queues for an ever-expanding
portfolio of mediocre services, and ultimately euthanasia under government bureaucracy.
Yep, just like in Canada
and Europe and a bunch of other countries. Of course Mr. Gilder can be forgiven for being confused. See apparently what he read was that access to health care was producing stronger "youth in Asia" and he naturally misread that phrase as euthanasia.
Or this one
Free
money, manifested in the near zero-interest-rate policy of the Federal Reserve,
diverts the wealth of savers to favored governments and crony capitalists while
creating shortages for everyone else.
Shortages? Well this
is a shortage of rational thought in Conservatism. Is that caused by zero interest rates?
Need more, try this
Ultimately
the Reagan boom would raise private-sector assets by another $60 trillion over
20 years, not halting until 2007.
Okay, a small confession here. We didn’t know the Reagan economic policies
from 1981-88 were responsible for the Clinton
economic boom of 1993-2000. Glad to
learn that fact.
But the most hilarious statement from the piece is this.
Mr.
Romney might also embrace Mr. Ryan's suggestion that the world's highest
corporate rate eventually be replaced with an 8.5% business-consumption tax
applying to the difference between costs and sales.
Uh George, the difference between costs and sales is taxable
income. A tax on that amount is a corporate
income tax, not a business consumption tax. And we already have a corporate income tax. Really, we do, you can look it up in all the tax books. And no, the U. S. does not have the world's highest effective corporate tax rate, because we have a bunch of provisions in the tax laws that prevent that. (Ever hear of accelerated depreciation George?).
But don’t worry, knowledge of basic business principles is not required to opinionate in the WSJ. We are sure they will have you back.
But don’t worry, knowledge of basic business principles is not required to opinionate in the WSJ. We are sure they will have you back.
No comments:
Post a Comment