During the past four
years one could get the impression that there was an immense divide among
economists, that about half believed in basic Keynesian theory and policy and
the other half believed in basic conservative dogma. It turns out this
is just not true as a panel at the recent AEA meetings showed.
But even on the question of
stimulus, most of the surveyed economists (80%) agreed that Obama's 2009
stimulus boosted output and employment (though fewer agreed that this boost was
worth the long-term costs). So it seems that the few top economists who a few
years ago were loudly saying that stimulus couldn't possibly work - Bob Lucas,
Robert Barro, Gene Fama, etc. - were just a very vocal small minority.
So what is going on here?
According to the pages of conservative publications like the Wall
Street Journal there is a whole body of economists opposed to the current
administration’s economic policy. The
answer of course is that are just a few, somewhat prominent economists who for
political rather than analytical reasons spout economic nonsense. So yes, the Stimulus did create economic
growth; expansionary monetary policy does not create inflation during a
recession; deficits do not lead to ‘bond
vigilantes’ causing a huge rise in the cost of government borrowing and so
forth.
In other words, almost all of the forecasts,
pronouncements and conclusions of so-called conservative economists have been
wrong. So why haven’t these supposedly
honest men and women recanted, or at least revised their conclusions and
opinions? Because that would mean
admitting their core philosophy was wrong, and since their positions are based
on faith rather than empiricism, it cannot be wrong.
In the meantime one can only hope that they never get
to influence public policy. Because then the U.
S. will really start to look like Greece , which
is the recipient of their policy today.
No comments:
Post a Comment