The dean of the
conservative political commentators for the Washington Post is George Will,
a man whose main claim to fame is to defend freedom of speech by endorsing
totally unlimited contributions to political causes. He has largely won that battle, and so the
half billion or so that private groups funneled into the Romney campaign with
no result has apparently left him both bereft of reason and a little bit
cranky.
So Mr. Will is
devoting an entire column about how monks in Louisiana
cannot sell the coffins they have made.
In the 1960s, Louisiana made it a
crime to sell “funeral merchandise” without a funeral director’s license. To
get one, the monks would have to stop being monks: They would have to earn 30
hours of college credit and apprentice for a year at a licensed funeral home to
acquire skills they have no intention of using. And their abbey would have to
become a “funeral establishment” with a parlor, able to accommodate 30 people,
and an embalming facility, even though they just want to make rectangular
boxes, not handle cadaver.
Now there is no doubt
this is a law designed to provide trade protection for the funeral
industry, but it is really no different than a thousand other laws with the
same goal for other industries. And yes
it is offensive and courts should rule the law void, so everyone (except the
funeral industry) agrees with Mr. Will.
But having nothing to
write about except the massive failure of Conservatives in the recently
completed election Mr. Will is reduced to making the Louisiana law a symbol of lost freedom, and
giving it importance comparable to jailing journalists, prohibiting political
speech and the like.
When circuit courts disagree,
the Supreme Court should referee. The monks’ lawyers — libertarians from the
Institute for Justice — want the court to confront the consequences of its 1873
mistake. So, the monks’ problem is much more than just another example of dumb
bullying by government in cahoots with powerful interests. Last month, the 5th Circuit appeals court
rejected Louisiana ’s
casket nonsense, saying, “Neither precedent nor broader principles suggest that
mere economic protection of a pet industry is a legitimate governmental
purpose.” And: “The great deference due state economic regulation does not
demand judicial blindness to the history of a challenged rule or the context of
its adoption nor does it require courts to accept nonsensical explanations for
naked transfers of wealth.”
One now waits for the George Will's of the world to start writing about all the other special treatments given to industry, like the huge tax breaks given to oil and energy companies, or the right of pipeline companies to condemn private land for their personal gain. No wait, those are provisions supported by Republicans and Conservatives.
So in Mr. Will’s
world this issue could set forth a “new birth of freedom”. No , that phrase refers to Lincoln ’s glorious speech
during the Civil War. Of course that is
a cause that in Mr. Will’s world probably is comparable to restrictions on
selling coffins in Louisiana .
No comments:
Post a Comment