In politics and the
drive for control of government, nothing, absolutely nothing is more
important than winning. If your
candidate says outrageous and offensive and disgusting things, that only
matters if it affects the voting. The latest
example of this is the reaction of the editorial writers of the Wall Street
Journal. This
is what they have to say about the comments of Republican Senate candidate
Todd Akins argument that rape victims cannot get pregnant.
He instructed the no
doubt startled interviewer that a woman's body could prevent pregnancy in the
case of "legitimate rape," whatever that might be, because "the
female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."
That's certainly a
novel reproductive concept, and a furor naturally erupted on Monday as his
comments became widely known.
That’s right, all we have here is a “novel
reproductive concept”, not something that displays ignorance and insensitivity that
comes only with cretins of a certain age.
So if the only problem here is Mr. Akin’s ‘novelty’ why does the Journal
have an issue?
The answer of course is that voters are a little more
demanding, and some but not all require actual intelligence and decency on the
part of their representatives. So it is
possible they might vote for the Democratic incumbent, and seriously harm
Republican chances to take control of the Senate. That is the real problem in the eyes of the
Conservatives.
Mr.
Akin may not be a quitter, but the question now is whether he is a sure loser
in November. He had won a three-way primary earlier this month and faced a
tough but winnable race against vulnerable Democratic incumbent Claire
McCaskill. The race will be that much tougher given that his remarks about rape
are likely to repel the women voters he will need to prevail.. . . . . .
Mr.
Akin and his most loyal supporters may consider this party reaction unfair
given that it is only one comment and he has apologized. But Senate control
could well be decided by a single seat, and on that hangs the future of
ObamaCare and much more than one candidate's fate.
If anyone is left with the clear impression that the
Conservative establishment wouldn’t care what Mr. Akin said if it did not
damage his elections chances, then that is indeed the right impression.
No comments:
Post a Comment