American scientists
continue to prove the notion that the U. S. government just wastes money
by successfully
placing a machine on the surface of Mars that will rove around and take
pictures.
NASA’s rover Curiosity
touched down deep in a Martian crater early Monday after a picture-perfect
descent and landing, beginning what promises to be one of the most ambitious
planetary missions in history.
Jubilant NASA
engineers and scientists let out a loud and prolonged whoop when the data came
in indicating that the one-ton rover had touched down. It remains unknown
exactly what shape the $2.5 billion rover is in, but the fact that it survived
its “seven
minutes of terror” descent was cheered like the grandest Olympic triumph.
Yes, it did cost $2.5
billion (and counting) but surely it was worth it.
The
descent and touchdown were tracked by the Mars orbiter Odyssey, which allowed
Curiosity to send black-and-white
“fisheye” (wide-angle) images within minutes of the rover’s wheels on
the ground. Two hours later, Odyssey passed over again and relayed other more
highly defined images, including one that appeared to show the distant rim of
the Gale Crater landing site.
Uh, The Dismal
Political Economist is just as enthusiastic as everyone else about a federal
government with a trillion dollar deficit spending billions on a space program
with absolutely no value except to send back pictures from Mars. But really, black and white fisheye
pictures. Look, for about $75.00 you can
get a nice 10 megapixel camera at K-Mart that will take nice color
pictures. Sorry NASA, black and white went out
in 1967.
Okay, enough with the
bitter sarcasm, what about the real scientific purpose of the project?
Described
by top NASA officials as their “mission of the decade,” the just-delivered
rover will search for the building blocks of extraterrestrial life as well as
investigate how and why Mars turned from a wet and warm planet into the dry and
cold place it is now.
Great, now millions of men and women can sleep soundly,
knowing that the fundamental question of this generation, namely why did Mars
turn dry and cold, may be answered. Is
it too late to tell NASA that Wikipedia already had the answer, that Mars turned cold
and dry because it went through a midlife crisis.
Thanks for sharing, it was interesting to read!
ReplyDelete