This Forum has
frequently commented on the travails of the state of Minnesota and its attempt to retain the Minnesota
Vikings football team. The attempt was a
success (?) as taxpayers in a state that shut down its government because of a
fight over taxes agreed to hand out hundreds of millions of dollars to build a
football stadium.
Apparently the next
team in the bulls eye is the St.
Louis Rams, previously the Los Angeles Rams and before that the Cleveland
Rams. The Rams were lured to St. Louis by a huge
public subsidy. This along with the
flight of the Oakland Raiders back to Oakland
left Los Angeles
with no professional football team. Far from being a problem, this has given
the NFL a huge lever over cities who will not cough up hundreds of millions to
keep a team. In essence the league
owners have the following position, pay up or we move the team to L. A.
For the past 17 years,
Los Angeles has
been the National Football League’s lost city of gold. The second-largest media
market in the U.S.
hasn’t had an NFL team since both the Rams and Raiders left town after the 1994
season in search of new stadiums. Now, the league appears ready for a return to
L.A. , and one of the most likely candidates to
relocate there is none other than those same Rams, currently playing in St. Louis . The
team’s potential round trip illustrates team owners’ continual success at playing
cities against one another to gain access to public funds.
The price tag for keeping the Rams in St. Louis is not a billion dollars of
taxpayer money, but it is close to that amount.
In
February the St. Louis
commission proposed a $124 million renovation of Edward Jones, including
upgraded box suites and a 96-foot-long video board. In May, the Rams came back
with a $700 million proposal calling for added bowl seating and an
adjustable roof. “It is our goal to keep the Rams in St. Louis for many years
to come and to do so with improvements to the facility that make sense to the
Rams ownership and our community,” CVC President Kathleen Ratcliffe wrote in an
e-mail.
But the NFL may have decided that the time has come
where they can make more money by putting teams in southern California .
While
Rams owner Stan Kroenke waits for an arbitrator’s ruling on the wildly
different proposals, two billionaires with competing plans say they’re ready to
build state-of-the-art venues in L.A.
as soon as the NFL delivers a team to take up residence. Philip Anschutz, whose
Anschutz Entertainment Group operates the Staples
Center and owns stakes in three L.A. teams—the NBA’s
Lakers, the NHL’s Kings, and pro soccer’s Galaxy—is backing Farmers Field, a
68,000-seat stadium to sit alongside Staples downtown.
Edward
Roski Jr., chairman of Majestic Realty, wants to build a 75,000-seat stadium in
City of Industry ,
20 miles east. Both pledge to bankroll the buildings with little or no
public money. In a memo sent to league owners on June 29 and first
reported in theLos Angeles Times, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell referred to
the two plans as “advanced to the point where the prospects for a new facility
are better than they have been in many years.” Any L.A. stadium should be prepared to house two
teams, he wrote. Since the NFL doesn’t have plans to expand beyond its current
32 clubs, that means two franchises will probably be on the move—putting more
pressure on host cities to keep owners happy.
One solution of course would be to let the local
community own the team, which seems only fair since in some, but not all,
cities they are the ones footing the bill for the stadiums. But that solution would deprive billionaires
of the ability to make even more money, so no, other than Green Bay that is not allowed. Oh, and don't believe the spin that in some cities the team and its private owners paid for the stadium, even in those cities the teams got millions in public funding for infrastructure. See, that's why government cannot afford to help provide health care, the money went to football stadiums and related projects.
No comments:
Post a Comment