It takes two third of
the Senate to a ratify a treaty, and the Senate has
just refused to ratify a treaty that provides basic rights for the
disabled.
The 2006 treaty, which
forbids discrimination of the disabled, has enjoyed bipartisan support. Sen.
John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
said the treaty would encourage other nations to develop the kind of protections
the United States
adopted 22 years ago with the Americans With Disabilities Act. The
international treaty’s thrust, he said, was a message: “Be more like us.”
J. Scott Applewhite/AP - Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), center, gestures during a news conference in Washington, Dec. 3, 2012, to urge Senate approval of an international agreement for protecting the rights of individuals with disabilities. The measure failed on Tuesday. |
The decency caucus of the Republican party, a group
that gets smaller and smaller every day supported the measure.
But
the treaty has split Republicans. Among its most vocal supporters were
Republican war veterans, including President George H.W. Bush and former
senator Bob Dole, who was injured in World War II and made a rare return to the
Senate floor Tuesday to observe the vote and lend his stature.
Former President George H. W. Bush was a great
supporter of the Americans With Disabilities Act, landmark legislation that
passed while he was President, and legislation which Republicans would probably
condemn to defeat today. But hard line
Conservatives see a threat in any government action to protect anyone but
themselves and their allies, the high net worth group.
Other
conservatives were deeply suspicious of the United Nations, which would oversee
treaty obligations. Those who opposed the treaty included former senator and
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, the father of a
developmentally disabled child who had traveled to Capitol Hill last week to
encourage fellow Republicans to vote no.
He
and other conservatives argued that the treaty could relinquish U.S.
sovereignty to a U.N. committee charged with overseeing a ban on discrimination
and determining how the disabled, including children, should be treated. They
particularly worried that the committee could violate the rights of parents who
choose to home school their disabled children.
“This
is a direct assault on us,” Santorum said.
No Mr. Santorum, you and your hostility to basic
rights, your ignorance, your prejudices and your hatred towards everyone with
whom you disagree is the direct assault on the American people here. Please go sir, just go.
Even as someone aware of the idiocy and sheer nastiness of senators like Inhofe, DeMint and Rubio, I was shocked at this. And the explanations for the no votes are simply disgraceful. An affront to American sovereignty? An attack on home schooling? Unbelievable.
ReplyDelete