For most of us the
arguments over what can appear on a license plate in the way of political
speech is somewhat silly. Do proponents
of any position really believe that an opposing person’s view is changed
because they see a short slogan on a auto license? Really, do they?
But there is still
the issue of government sponsored speech.
Because a license plate is issued by government the issue of what can go
on it is important if the principles of democracy are to be upheld. If governments allows one position on a
license plate, it should allow all positions, other than those which are
obscene or clearly inappropriate.
But Republican don’t
like that aspect of democracy. In North Carolina they only
wanted to
allow one position on the abortion rights issue on their plates.
The 2011 law, which
approved other specialty plates, too, would have directed proceeds from the
"Choose Life" plates to the Carolina
Pregnancy Care Fellowship, a nonprofit pregnancy care ministry.
Attempts to persuade
the Republican-led legislature to amend legislation to include “Respect Choice”
plates or “Trust Women. Respect Choice” plates failed.
And rightfully so a Federal judge ruled the decision to
allow only one point of view was wrong.
U.S.
District Court Judge James Fox ruled Friday that the state’s attempt to offer
“Choose Life” plates only is unconstitutional because it is “viewpoint
discrimination in violation of the First Amendment.”
But one has to sympathize with the Republicans here, after think how hard it must be for them to say they maintain support for the Constitution and not break into snickering laughter.
No comments:
Post a Comment