One of the more
contentious issues in the Presidential race is Mitt Romney’s contention
that his tax
cut plans are sound fiscal policy.
Now the key elements of his plans are to (1) cut rates 20% across the
board (2) eliminate the Estate Tax and (3) reduce itemized deductions in an
unspecified manner. According to Mr.
Romney this will have the following results.
- Taxes will not be cut for wealthy taxpayers.
- Taxes will not be raised for middle and low income tax payers
- The tax plan will not increase the deficit, it will be revenue neutral.
- Economic growth will take place as a result of the tax plan.
So why the claim that
this is a lie. Because the claims of
Mr. Romney just cannot be true. First of
all elimination of the Estate Tax will provide tens of billions in tax
reduction for the wealthiest 2% of Americans, because they are the only ones
paying the Estate Tax. Mr. Romney’s family will save maybe $100 million or so
in taxes. So the plan must cut taxes for wealthy tax
payers, that is a certainty.
The claim that taxes will not be raised for middle
and low income tax payers cannot exist with the claim that the plan will be
revenue neutral. The way that Mr. Romney
is making this claim is by assertion only because he will not release details
of his tax plans.
“What I’ve said is I
won’t put in place a tax cut that adds to the deficit. That’s part one. So
there’s no economist that can say Mitt Romney’s tax plan adds $5 trillion if I
say I will not add to the deficit with my tax plan.’’
Notice the arrogance here, the condescension, the
argument that deference must be given to Mr. Romney because he says something
even though he doesn’t back it up with any facts, details, analysis or data. This is a window in to the entitlement
mentality of a person who expects everyone to accept what he says without
questions, even though what he says is patently untrue.
Finally, the idea
that the tax plan will spur economic growth is based solely on the fact
that marginal rates will be lower. The
thinking is that people will work harder with lower rates. It ignores the fact that most Americans are
working as hard as they can just to survive in this economy. The goal of lower marginal rates is not
economic growth, it is to allow the very wealthy to have even more as their
incomes and fortunes grow, largely at the expense of the middle class.
Mr. Obama did not make any of this argument in his
debate. If he is incapable of doing so
maybe he doesn’t deserve to be President, but even if he doesn’t the country
does not deserve the rampant dishonesty of Mitt Romney.
No comments:
Post a Comment