It’s Not Just For Medicare
As a way to reduce
the Federal government’s bill for providing health care for seniors
Republicans are proposing the change the current program to one of private
insurance. The government would give
each senior a voucher or premium subsidy and the senior would then go out and
shop for insurance on their own. The
selling point is that competition would make care affordable. This is fantasy. The goal is to reduce the amount paid for by
the Feds and increase the costs borne by the individuals.
So far this change in
Medicare has no traction, but in the private sector employers who are
suffering from an increasing high cost of employee health care are now starting
to implement a similar plan. Sears and
Darden Restaurants (Olive Garden and the like) will go
to this type of plan.
Two big employers are
planning a radical change in the way they provide health benefits to their
workers, giving employees a fixed sum of money and allowing them to choose their
medical coverage and insurer from an online marketplace.
This is not exactly like the Medicare proposal, because
employees will still be choosing from group plans, unlike senior who will have
to obtain individual coverage if the Republican plan takes effect. But like the Republican plan the companies’
say their goal is not burden shifting but cost reduction.
But this is simply window dressing. Look at the chart on costs and who pays,
employee vs. employer. Everyone knows
that the goal here is the same as the goal of those who would replace Medicare
with premium subsidies, reduce the costs of employer and as health care costs
go up, shift more of the burden to employees.
Is this the end of employer group health insurance programs
that are largely paid for by employer contributions? Yes, but unless the health care system is
reformed so that fee for service systems are eliminated, that was going to
happen one way or another. Sorry workers
and seniors, you’re going to be on your own.
No comments:
Post a Comment