Now that the Supreme
Court has ruled on the Obama health care law attention on the political
front can turn to the selection by Mitt Romney of his Vice Presidential running
mate. Each prospective candidate is out
there making the basic attacks on President Obama and on the health care law
that are required for consideration to be on the ticket.
Recently it was
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal who made his pitch to the radical Conservative
wing of the Republican party (Yes that is the only wing, it is a one winged
party). As per standard form, Mr. Jindal’s
attacks were long on heated rhetoric, short on facts and flat wrong on the
economics of health care.
“The president, his administration, needs to understand what makes this country great in part is that we’re not dependent on government programs,” the Republican governor said on “Fox & Friends.” “It seems to me like the president measures success by how many people are on food stamp rolls and government-run health care. That’s not the American dream.”
Let’s see, there is no
direct evidence that the President wants anyone to be on Food Stamps, so it
must be the fact that the Administration supports nutrition assistance for low
income people, a decent and humane position if ever there was one that drives
Mr. Jindal’s accusations. But the
Governor really shows his ignorant commitment to ideology over practicality in
his condemnation of the Medicaid expansion in the new health care law.
La. Gov. JIndal "You're darn right I will put my VP aspirations ahead of the fiscal and health care welfare of my state". |
Republicans
on Capitol Hill have urged
governors to consider dropping out of the provision of the law that
expands Medicaid coverage.
Jindal
said Tuesday that he is determined to “stand up and say no.”
“It
makes no sense. This is a bad law. Obamacare, it doesn’t do what the president
promised,” he said. “Governors have the right, now with the Supreme Court ruling.
They should stand up. We’re not expanding Medicaid.
So what are the facts? Well Louisiana
is a relatively poor state with a large amount of low income people who do not
have health care insurance. Many of
these people would get health insurance under the Medicaid expansion. What’s the fiscal impact? It
is this.
Over the 6 year period of 2014-19 Louisiana would have to fund the
Medicaid expansion to the amount of $337 million, or less than $60 million a
year. Over that same period the state
would get over $7.2 billion for health care coverage from the Federal
government. Furthermore, if the state
turns down the Federal expansion it will almost certainly have to spend more
than the $60 million a year to provide basic health care to people who cannot
afford it and leave the system wallowing in unpaid bills. And by not having the Feds $7.2 billion the
health care system in Louisiana
will have to charge more for services.
Taking the Federal money is so logically obvious that one would think even a rigid, ideologically driven
Conservatives would want to do it.
Apparently Conservatives are blind to even the obvious.
The Food Stamps line is one of the mainstream Republican talking points. It goes with the (implied?) Republican argument that Democrats want to keep poor people dependent on government assistance to ensure a steady stream of Democratic voters. With this argument comes the view that people who need government assistance or inherently undeserving of that assistance.
ReplyDeleteIt's remarkable how inarticulate Jindal, Romney and other high-profile Republicans have been in resisting the ACA. Jindal, for example, cannot even produce a coherent sentence as to why Louisiana must "stand up and say no" to the ACA. It's also remarkable that anyone, let alone a potential majority of voters, buys this crap.