The Economist Admits the Futility of the Project
Even though only
about 50 people in the entire world understood what it was all about, the
fanfare from the discovery of a sub-atomic particle called Higg’s Boson has been gushing almost non stop. Here is the cover of The Economist, an
otherwise highly noteworthy and quality publication.
And from the lead
commentary in that issue here
is the crux of the discovery.
For non-physicists,
the importance of finding the Higgs belongs to the realm of understanding
rather than utility. It adds to the sum of human knowledge—but it may never
change lives as DNA or relativity have. Within 40 years, Einstein’s theories
paved the way for the Manhattan
Project and the scourge of nuclear weapons. The deciphering of DNA has led
directly to many of the benefits of modern medicine and agriculture. The last
really useful subatomic particle to be discovered, though, was the neutron in
1932. Particles found subsequently are too hard to make, and too short-lived to
be useful.
And so the Higg’s Boson joins other projects like the $2.5
billion Mars Lander, projects which add to the sum of human knowledge, provide
no useful benefits other than to the very few people who have an academic
interest in the subject and which take vital resources from the many to give to
the small group of scientists whose only mission is to satisfy their own thirst
for knowledge at the expense of the community as a whole.
At least this discovery did not pave the way for any kind of scourge.
ReplyDelete