A local issue in the Maryland countryside normally
would not attract much attention, but this one exposes the incredible short
sightedness and ignorance of people who are trying to preserve rural areas from
uncontrolled growth. The issue involves
a billionaire, Mitchell Rales and his desire
to exhibit a fabulous art collection by building a beautiful museum on his
rural estate outside Washington .
The full scope of his
ambitions for Glenstone did not become clear until recently, when the
obsessively secretive billionaire sent an e-mail to many of those who attended
the party. In it, he revealed his grand vision for Glenstone, which would
include a new museum that would rival the size of the East Building
of the National Gallery of Art.
Mr. Rales is a billionaire, but as billionaires go he
seems a fairly benign one.
During
two interviews, Rales admitted he was nervous, but he stressed the point that
he is devoted to the idea of opening up his estate to the public.
“I
sit here and I say to myself, ‘I am 55 years old, I have had an incredible
amount of good fortune in my life.’ I have had to make some choices about how
to bestow some of that good fortune back to the world,” he said.
He doesn’t want to
impose an authoritarian right wing agenda on America . He doesn’t want to gut the Federal government
and he is not using his billions to foment political and social discord. He lives very quietly and is an avid art
collector. He is obviously not like a
lot of other billionaires, those that belong to the “We hate America club”.
So what is the
issue? It is this.
The current museum - Do Environmentalists want something like this, or would they prefer a big old septic tank? |
To
achieve that, though, Rales, who co-founded the highly profitable Danaher Corp., wants something that his $3
billion in net worth cannot buy: a connection to the public sewer system.
Again, what’s the
issue? Well here it is.
Glenstone
is in an area of Montgomery where, to help control growth, sewers are generally
banned; instead, septic systems are used. The county planning board voted down
Rales’s request in late May, citing environmental concerns and the risk of
setting a precedent that could dismantle the sewer ban throughout the
slow-growth area. Local environmental groups and some neighbors are opposed,
noting that, at 3,000 feet, the sewer line would be one of the longest ever
approved by the county and would run across an environmentally vulnerable stream.
Yes, read that first
sentence again, which is to say, think about the idiocy of banning sewers
and relying on septic tanks to manage growth and the environment. Septic tanks are like little waste water
treatment plants, but they are prone to malfunction and are highly unreliable
in that role. They tend to send polluted
water into the ground if they are not maintained properly, and yes they are
typically not maintained properly. A
proper sewage/waste water treatment facility is far superior.
And yet the idiots
(no the word is not too strong) who are in charge here are deliberately
supporting the highly polluting septic systems over proper waste treatment to
prevent uncontrolled growth. Of course
the proper way of preventing
uncontrolled growth is to prevent uncontrolled growth. Zoning standards are a fine method, as are
other regulations. Supporting septic
systems over sewage treatment is like saying they will make the land and water
so polluted that growth will not take place.
What insanity.
But nevertheless
people this ignorant are trying to prevent Mr. Rales from getting his
hookup, even though he would pay the cost.
Look people, it is hard enough trying to prevent greedy and rapacious
developers from despoiling the American rural landscape, why do you also have
to be part of the problem?
As usual, TDPE, you state the obvious perfectly! Well done.
ReplyDelete