[Editor's note: In celebration of the fact that The Dismal Political Economist actually has a post which is positive and laudatory of public officials this will be the only post today. A complimentary post like this is such a rare event that it should be savored by itself.]
In Britain the
persona of the Conservative Party, which now controls the government is
still one of Margaret Thatcher. Ms.
Thatcher seemed to come across as a rather mean spirited person, one who took particular delight in removing government support for the most vulnerable citizens on the
theory that the young, the ill, the disabled and the elderly needed to get
along on their own without the collective help of society.
The current leader of
the Conservative Party, and hence Prime Minister is David Cameron. Mr. Cameron styles himself as a new kind of
Conservative, one devoted to environmental and social issues. Unfortunately he has handed off his economic
policy to George Osborne, the old type of Conservative who has focused solely
on reducing the deficit, and who has implemented policies whose most significant result
is sending the economy into recession.
But on his own Mr.
Cameron has exhibited traits of a desirable type of Conservative. He supports changing the outdated House of
Lords to a Senate like body where, gasp, members are actually elected rather
than serve by heredity. And he supports
gay marriage, on the rather logical conservative grounds that government should not be
involved in people’s private lives.
And in a rather
remarkable position, Mr. Cameron has come out very strongly for providing women
in developing nations with family planning services. At a meeting in London co-sponsored by the Gates Foundation Mr.
Cameron was downright eloquent in support for allowing women to control
their own bodies and their own lives.
David Cameron was
given a standing ovation after announcing Britain is doubling its financial
support for family planning services to £1bn over the next eight years, but was
immediately asked how he would tackle religious opposition to the efforts.
He said Britain ’s
contribution would save the life of a woman or girl in the developing world
every two hours for the next eight years by preventing deaths caused by too
many pregnancies, too close together.
This is powerful stuff, as there are many forces
arrayed against Mr. Cameron on this issue.
But instead of using the typical weasel words of politicians, Mr.
Cameron made an unconditional statement of his position
Mr
Cameron said: "When a woman is prevented from choosing when to have
children it is not just a violation of her human rights it can fundamentally
compromise her chances in life and the opportunities for her children.
"Family
planning works not just because smaller families can be healthier and wealthier
but because empowering women is the key to growing economies and healthy open
societies."
Mr
Cameron added: "We're not talking about some kind of Western imposed
population control, forced abortion or sterilisation.
"What
we're saying today is quite the opposite. We're not telling anyone what to do.
We're giving women and girls the power to decide for themselves."
and in doing so he provided the words and logic for every
person who supports basic human rights.
Equal praise must
also go to Melinda Gates, wife of Bill and a prime mover in the cause to
provide every woman in the world with a basic right. The Gates Foundation is putting more than
$500 million towards the cause, and Ms. Gates was equally eloquent in her
defense of her position.
“I
believe in not letting women die, I believe in not letting babies die, and to
me that’s more important than arguing about what method of contraception [is
right].”
And for those politicians in this country, who
cravenly use the attempts to provide women with access to family planning as a
method to invoke a phony ‘war on religious freedom’ or anti catholic bias,
there is this to be said about Melinda Gates.
A
life-long Catholic, Mrs Gates said she had grappled with her faith before
deciding to speak out against the Vatican ’s opposition to
contraception.
“Of
course I wrestled with this. As a Catholic I believe in this religion, there
are amazing things about this religion, amazing moral teachings that I do
believe in, but I also have to think about how we keep women alive,” she said
in an interview in advance of the summit.
Yes, powerful stuff, but then it has to be in order
to fight those who would impose their own religious or moral beliefs on women,
to the detriment of the health and lives of those women.
No comments:
Post a Comment