Because the Wall
Street Journal is owned by mega Conservative and all around mean person,
Rupert Murdoch, its book reviews are often non-objective rants and opinions on
the topic at hand. Such is the case in
the Journal’s
Review of Cass Sustein’s new book, Simpler: The Future of Government. The message from the review, regulation
robs everyone of freedom.
In fact, regulation
is the enemy of progress, freedom, initiative and everything else that is
good.
There is a deeper threat posed by a paternalist state,
however "libertarian" we might wish it to be, and it isn't easily
accounted for by cost-benefit analysis. Friedrich Hayek highlighted it in
"The Road to Serfdom" (1944): "The political ideals of a people
and its attitude toward authority are as much the effect as the cause of the
political institutions under which it lives. This means . . . that even a
strong tradition of political liberty is no safeguard if the danger is
precisely that the new institutions and policies will gradually undermine and
destroy that spirit."
And regulation takes
away basic freedoms.
But
the regulatory state as envisioned by Mr. Sunstein is nevertheless deeply
opposed to America 's
traditions of liberty and individual responsibility. Such regulation will chew
away like a cancer at those traditions. If Mr. Sunstein's blueprint for
regulation is indeed the future of government, we might, as a result, be
well-regulated—but we won't be free.
Gosh, without
regulation what would we be free to do?
Well we would be free to consume drugs that may harm or kills us; eat
food that was unsafe, work in factories that were dangerous, pollute the air,
water and earth in an unlimited amount etc. etc. etc. Oh and we would be free to die in explosions
like the one in Texas ,
where
regulatory laxness was a factor.
The very picture of lack of regulation in West, Texas |
The uncertainty over who was aware of the
chemical at the plant and who was not, both at the site and in Washington,
illustrates the patchwork regulatory world the plant operated in and the ways
in which it slipped through bureaucratic cracks at the federal, state and local
levels.
One week after the blast, investigators were still not sure
how much ammonium nitrate was stored there, whether it had been stored properly
and which agencies had been informed about it — even though a host of federal,
state and local officials were responsible for regulating and monitoring the
plant’s operations and products.
Many safety decisions — including moves in recent years to
build homes, schools and a nursing home not far from the decades-old plant —
were left to local officials who often did not have the expertise to assess the
dangers.
Good regulation is
essential to modern capitalism and free enterprise. Good regulation makes everyone more free, not
less, because they are free to engage in activities knowing that they will not
harm themselves or others. But the folks
at the WSJ don’t understand that, because the freedom of Conservatives to
exploit the weak, the old, the sick and the young would not be as great.
No comments:
Post a Comment