Probably Would Not Get Him the Adoration He Craves
Budget proposals are just that, proposals. They never get enacted as proposed. But they do give an insight into the
priorities of an administration. And in
this case they illustrate that this administration has no priority for
environmental protection. A draft budget
proposal has been leaked (probably deliberately as a trial balloon)
to the WaPo.
The plan to slash EPA’s staff from its current level of 15,000
to 12,000, which could be accomplished in part through a buyout offer as well
as layoffs, is one of several changes for which the new administration has
asked agency staff for comment by close of business Wednesday. Multiple
individuals briefed on the plan confirmed the request by OMB, which did not
immediately respond to a request for comment.
The
proposal also dictates cutting the agency’s grants to states, including its air
and water programs, by 30 percent, and eliminating 38 separate programs in
their entirety. Programs designated for zero funding include grants to clean up
brownfields, or abandoned industrial sites; a national electronic manifest
system for hazardous waste; environmental justice programs; climate-change
initiatives; and funding for native Alaskan villages.
Well there goes 3,000 jobs by the (in)famous job
creator, about three times the number the Pres sorta, maybe saved in Indianapolis to great acclaim (most his). But notice what will happen to
clean up activities, and maybe Alaskans will re-think their adoration of
Republicans when they and not the feds have to support native Alaskan villages.
And there is this.
Craig Kenworthy, who serves as executive director of the Puget
Sound Clean Air Agency and co-president of NACAA, said in an interview that air
officials across the United
States would not be able to meet
their statutory responsibilities if their funding were cut that deeply. He
noted that the Benton Clean Air Agency in central Washington has five staff members responsible
for duties including monitoring air quality, issuing permits and
letting local farmers when they can burn fields.
“It’s
basically saying to the local agencies, ‘So you still have to meet all the
federal requirements, and then you’re going to lose a quarter to a third of
your budgets,’ ” Kenworthy said, noting that he worries environmental groups
could sue them if they don’t fulfill their legal responsibilities. “I
understand there may be some people in the new administration who may not like
some of the current Clean Air Act requirements … but we still have meet
them.”
Remember when Republicans fumed against unfunded mandates,
requirements imposed on state and local governments without the necessary
funding to perform the actions. Well
guess what, unfunded mandates are back and Donnie’s got them.
No comments:
Post a Comment