And His Solutions – More War on the Poor
That the United
States has made significant strides in
reducing poverty is not dispute, but the gains have not been evenly
distributed. Thanks to enhanced Social
Security and Medicare, poverty among the elderly population has been
substantially reduced. But thanks to
cuts in government programs passed by Republicans and supported somewhat by
Democrats who never want to be charged with favoring government spending,
poverty among children, single parents and young people is still very
persistent.
So potential and likely Presidential candidate Marco Rubio
is celebrating the conservative win against government programs to fight
poverty by
proposing even worse solutions.
“Five
decades and trillions of dollars after President Johnson waged his War on
Poverty, the results of this big-government approach are in,” he said. “We have
four million Americans who have been out of work for six months or more.”
Rubio
added that “economic, social, cultural and educational changes and challenges”
have caused poverty to get worse and that the federal government was not
equipped to fix it.
Rubio,
a potential 2016 contender for the GOP nomination, is one of several top
Republicans who have been speaking publicly about poverty in recent days and
offering alternative proposals to help middle-class and low-income Americans.
Well of course we have long term unemployment Mr. Rubio. It's what you and your party have been fighting for these last five years, and successfully so.
So what is Mr. Rubio fo?. Well certainly not for unemployment benefits.
So what is Mr. Rubio fo?. Well certainly not for unemployment benefits.
On Tuesday, Rubio joined 37 Republicans in voting against continuing
debate on the extension of unemployment insurance.
And we all know from his previous votes that he is against
government support for public education, more training, and more help for low
income Americans. He certainly doesn’t
want to raise the minimum wage. So what’s
his big idea? Oh, he would give the
Federal money to the states.
Among the
changes to the system Rubio proposed was a plan to consolidate federal funding
for anti-poverty programs into the one agency and give those funds to the
states. The key to addressing poverty, Rubio emphasized in his high-profile
speech, is decentralizing.
“These
Flex Funds would be transferred to the states so they can design and fund
creative initiatives that address the factors behind inequality of opportunity”
closer to home, Rubio said.
But about all this proposal does is confirm that Mr. Rubio
is ignorant on his subject, that he doesn’t know that much of Federal spending
on support for low income programs is already joint federal/state
programs. Of course he doesn’t exactly
know how spending the same amount of money (actually probably less) would
change things.
Rubio said his staff was still working through the details of what would
be a part of the “Flex Funds” but said programs like food stamps could
potentially be included.
And one other program would change the Earned Income Credit,
essentially making it a weekly or semi-weekly progam, as if that would do
anything to help low income employees.
So yeah, Sen. Rubio is ecstatic that poverty is not defeated. He and Republicans have prevailed because he and his co-horts severely damaged programs designed to defeat
poverty. And now, if he has his way
things can get even worse.
No comments:
Post a Comment