It has now been about
two years since British voters voted for a coalition government headed by
the Conservative Party, with a partnership of the Liberal Democrats, a center
left group that abandoned their principles (and their supporters) in order to
get a few of its party leaders into leadership positions in the
government. This also means that it has
been about two years since Britain ’s
Conservatives implemented an economic policy that was unique in that it had
absolutely no basis in modern Macroeconomic Theory.
The gist of the
policy was that the key to economic growth, higher employment and
prosperity was to generate “confidence”.
In the Conservative Party’s view, this “confidence” does not result from
the belief that the private sector will grow, supported by the public
sector. Instead in their world Conservatives
believe that the business confidence needed to invest and hire will come from the
fact that the government is reducing its deficit and from lower interest rates.
So the British
government set forth on a policy to slightly raise taxes, some of which
have been cut back already, and to cut public spending and cut public
employment and put a whole lot of people out of work. The results are exactly what Econ 101 would
have predicted, an economy that has returned to recession, with high
unemployment and a total absence of any business confidence.
But supposedly one
positive aspect of such a policy is that inflation will not be a
problem.
A SLUGGISH economy
ought at least to enjoy low inflation. Price-cutting should be fierce when jobs
are scarce and businesses are fighting for custom.
Instead the headline of that story from The Economist
is this
The economy
Hard going
Steady growth and 2% inflation seem a long way off
May 19th 2012 | from the print edition
__________________________________________________________________
Inflation
rose to 3.5% in March and is likely to remain above the 2% target for another
year, according to the Bank of England ’s
latest Inflation Report.
There is plenty of blame
The
committee has blamed high inflation on things beyond its control: the delayed
effect of a weaker pound, successive increases in VAT and persistently high
global oil and commodity prices. But that still leaves a puzzle as to why
economic weakness at home is not doing more to pull inflation down.
The
readiest answer is that there is less slack in the economy than the bank
thinks. Business surveys suggest only a small proportion of firms are operating
below capacity. That finding looks odd given the economy’s output is still 4%
below its level at the start of 2008, and is much farther below the level it
would have reached if GDP growth had continued at its long-term rate. The
picture painted by surveys could be right if a chunk of the economy’s potential
has been written off for good.
none of which reflects well on the Conservative’s economic
policy. But the part of the story that
ought to concern everyone the most is this.
But
Sir Mervyn King, the bank’s governor, doubts this. There is “no obvious reason”
why the economy could not rejoin its pre-crisis path, though it might take a
decade or two to get there, he said on May 16th.
Yes, you are reading that correctly. Britain ’s policy is so disastrous
that it may well take 10 to 20 years to get back to pre-crisis growth
levels. That’s what Conservatives call a
success.
It's perfect time to make some plans for the long run and it's time to be happy. I've read this post and if I may I want to suggest you some fascinating issues or suggestions. Maybe you could write next articles relating to this article. I wish to read more issues about it!
ReplyDeleteMy web page :: black glass coffee tables uk