Advocates of the Worst Foreign/Military Policy Ever?
Against all odds, and
even after the incompetent and inept Obama policy and actions with respect to Syria it is
possible, just possible that the whole thing might not turn out too badly. While it is more likely than not that nothing
of significance will happen with Syria’s chemical weapons, there is now the chance that Syria will not use chemical weapons and no U. S. military action takes place.
This is not good
enough for the war cheerleaders John McCain and Lindsey Graham. They
are furious, just furious that the U.S. is not committed to military
action in the ugly and horrific Syrian conflict.
Sens. McCain and Graham - Asking Why the U. S. Cannot Have Another War in the Middle East - Since the last ones turned out so great. |
But
McCain and Graham, in a separate joint statement, saw little good in the
U.S.-Russia deal.
Without
a United Nations Security Council resolution that would threaten the use of
force for noncompliance by the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad, the two
senators said, “this framework agreement is meaningless. Assad will use the
months and months afforded to him to delay and deceive the world using every
trick in Saddam Hussein’s playbook.”
“Is
the message of this agreement that Assad is now our negotiating partner, and
that he can go on slaughtering innocent civilians and destabilizing the Middle
East using every tool of warfare, so long as he does not use chemical weapons?”
the senators asked, concluding: “That is morally and strategically
indefensible.”
Uh, John and Lindsey, Saddam didn't have chemical weapons, remember? Oh yes, you never believed that despite the fact that none were ever found.
Now everyone is horrified by the senseless slaughter in
McCain and Graham would have us intervene on behalf of
the so-called moderates in Syria .
“The only way
this underlying conflict can be brought to a decent end is by significantly
increasing our support to moderate opposition forces in Syria ,” they
said. “We must strengthen their ability to degrade Assad’s military advantage,
change the momentum on the battlefield, and thereby create real conditions for
a negotiated end to the conflict.”
These moderates of course are in short supply, maybe in non-existent. Almost all of the forces arrayed against Syria ’s Assad
are fanatical fundamentalists whose brutality matches that of those they are
fighting. They hate the U. S. , they hate Israel and once in power they would probably be just as cruel and brutal as the current regime.
The U.S.
armed and aided the Taliban in Afghanistan . How did that work out?
No comments:
Post a Comment