Advocates of the Worst Foreign/Military Policy Ever?
Against all odds, and even after the incompetent and inept Obama policy and actions with respect to
Syria it is
possible, just possible that the whole thing might not turn out too badly. While it is more likely than not that nothing
of significance will happen with Syria’s chemical weapons, there is now the chance that Syria will not use chemical weapons and no U. S. military action takes place.
This is not good enough for the war cheerleaders John McCain and Lindsey Graham. They are furious, just furious that the
U.S. is not committed to military
action in the ugly and horrific Syrian conflict.
|Sens. McCain and Graham - Asking Why the U. S. Cannot Have Another War in the Middle East - Since the last ones turned out so great.|
But McCain and Graham, in a separate joint statement, saw little good in the U.S.-Russia deal.
Without a United Nations Security Council resolution that would threaten the use of force for noncompliance by the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad, the two senators said, “this framework agreement is meaningless. Assad will use the months and months afforded to him to delay and deceive the world using every trick in Saddam Hussein’s playbook.”
“Is the message of this agreement that Assad is now our negotiating partner, and that he can go on slaughtering innocent civilians and destabilizing the Middle East using every tool of warfare, so long as he does not use chemical weapons?” the senators asked, concluding: “That is morally and strategically indefensible.”
Now everyone is horrified
McCain and Graham would
These moderates of course are in short supply, maybe in non-existent. Almost all of the forces arrayed against
are fanatical fundamentalists whose brutality matches that of those they are
fighting. They hate the Syria U. S., they hate and once in power they would probably be just as cruel and brutal as the current regime. Israel
armed and aided the Taliban in . How did that work out? Afghanistan