A Legislative Proposal That Was Probably One of the Worst
Ever
Normally when the
Republican controlled House blocks legislation the nation suffers, but in
the case of the Senate passed 10 year Farm Bill, rejection by the House was
just a huge plus for the American people
This bill was one of the worst ever considered in Washington, and its defeat
will hopefully mean that real farm reform legislation can take place and that
adequate funding for nutrition needs can be provided.
Why was the bill so
bad? Consider these things.
The
House bill would have cut projected spending in farm and nutrition programs by
nearly $40 billion over the next 10 years. Just over half, $20.5 billion, would
have come from cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food
stamps. The House bill, like the Senate’s version, would have eliminated $5
billion a year in direct payments to farmers, which are made annually whether
or not they grow crops.
Billions
of dollars saved by eliminating the payments would be directed into a $9
billion crop insurance program. New subsidies would be created for peanut,
cotton and rice farmers. Lawmakers left intact the sugar program, keeping price
supports and restrictions on imports.
The subsidies for crop insurance would have meant
billions going to very wealthy farmers, and little benefit for the so-called
family farms, many of which no longer exist.
Subsidies for various crops, all supported by so-called Conservatives
would have remained in place and nutrition assistance in the form of food
stamps for those who literally cannot afford to buy enough to eat would have
been drastically cut.
No one is sure what will happen as current farm
legislation expires. But whatever
happens it is hard to see how it could be worse than what the Senate passed and
the House rejected.
Thanks Republicans, sometimes you help the nation in
spite of yourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment