Economic Development vs. Supporting Education – An Urban
Dilemma
DePaul University
|
In May,
Mayor Rahm Emanuel and the university announced a proposal for a 10,000 seat,
$173 million arena near McCormick
Place , a convention center along the lakefront
south of downtown. DePaul and the quasi-government agency that runs McCormick Place
would chip in $70 million each for the publicly owned venture. The city’s tab would
be $33 million, and that has created a bit of a stir.
The city counters
that calling the project only an investment in a basketball arena is
shortsighted and incomplete. DePaul represents one piece of a $1.1 billion
investment to boost tourism, a plan that includes adding amenities to McCormick Place ,
which has lost convention business to cities like Orlando
and Las Vegas ,
and sprucing up Navy Pier, the state’s No. 1 tourist attraction, which is just
north of downtown.
The arena is part of a goal to revitalize the South
Loop neighborhood, and the project includes two hotels, new
restaurants and areas for entertainment, and potentially a casino.
The arena would be an events center for concerts and conventions
when DePaul is not playing, and the university has agreed to pay rent at
$25,000 a game for men’s home dates and $7,500 for women’s games.
DePaul’s $70 million investment was needed, Tom Alexander, a city
spokesman, said, because it would ensure that construction at Navy Pier and McCormick Place
could proceed in tandem. “This is really a facility the entire city can use,”
he said. “DePaul is helping facilitate it.”
Then there are the 10,000 construction and 3,800 permanent jobs
that it would create, by the city’s math. The unemployment rate in the Chicago metro area is
more than 9 percent.
“I would be safe to assume any city in the country would love to
have these jobs and these types of announcements,” said Jorge Ramirez, the
president of the Chicago
Federation of Labor.
Are any of these
promised economic development really going to happen? Hard to say, cities and developers notoriously
overestimate the public benefits of investment like this. To argue that 10,000 construction jobs
will be created is not credible. And the
construction jobs that are created will be temporary, short term and maybe even
part time.
The solution here is
to adopt what conservatives would propose if conservatives were true to
their principles, which is to let market forces decide the issue. In this situation the groups involved should
form a corporation which will own and operate the arena, and borrow the funds
for the city’s contribution amount with only the profits of the arena available
to make the debt service payments. If
the proponents can convince the bond market that the project is viable great, no problem.
If not, then why should the city get involved in a financial loser when
it has so many other problems.
See, sometimes conservative principles are
appropriate. We just need principled
conservatives to be present, which unfortunately is a harder proposition than borrowing money
for a basketball arena for DePaul
University .
No comments:
Post a Comment