One of the continual
themes of Conservatism is that government not only is expanding it power
and interference in everyone’s life, it lacks the legal authority to do
so. So Conservatives ought to hail the
continued efforts of Federal Judge Edward R. Korman to strike down the federal
governments attempts to prevent the so-called Plan B birth control pill from
being sold to anyone who wants it.
Under Federal law,
the government will approve sale of a product if it is proven to be safe
and effective. Plan B has met this
criteria. But for some reason the
government wants to restrict the ability of young women to buy the
product. Actually it is not just some
reason, the government feels that these women should not be engaging in sexual
activity and so must be prevented from obtaining birth control.
In an earlier ruling
Judge Korman struck down the government restrictions, saying they had no
basis in law. The government has asked
him to stay his decision and his
answer was an emphatic NO! Here is
some background.
On
April 5, 2013, I issued an order directing the defendants--the Commissioner of
Food and Drugs and the Secretary of Health and Human Services--to grant the
Citizen Petition filed by the plaintiffs and make levonorge strel-based
emergency contraceptives available over-the counter and without point-of-sale
or age restrictions. I did so because the Secretary's action was politically
motivated, scientifically unjustified, and contrary to agency precedent, and
because it could not provide a basis to sustain the denial of the Citizen
Petition.
And here is the language at the conclusion of the
Judge’s decision.
The motion for a
stay pending the appeal is denied. Indeed, in my view, the defendants' appeal
is frivolous and is taken for the purpose of delay. Nevertheless, as a courtesy
to the Courtof Appeals, and to
enable it to schedule the motion in the ordinary course, I grant a stay pending
the hearing or submission of the defendants' motion for a stay in the Court of
Appeals on the condition that the motion for a stay be filed by noon on May 13,
2013.
Basically the Judge has said that the Secretary of
HHS had no authority to overrule the FDA and do what she did, that she did so
only for political reasons and that she has no basis in law to expect to win on
appeal. (Notice he did stay his decision
to allow a possible appellate court to issue a temporary stay, which is likely
to happen.)
Conservatives ought to be celebrating in the
streets. For years they have complained
of an expanded Federal government and of a judiciary that let’s the Feds get
away with it. So here they should have
their new hero, a Judge who stands up to and smacks down arbitrary and
capricious actions by the government.
Of course, Conservatives will not do any of
that. They will condemn the Judge,
because in reality they are not against government intervening in the private
lives of citizens. They just want
government to intervene to force the way they want people to behave. A gilded statue of the god of hypocrisy goes to
the first Conservative commentator to criticize the ruling in their typical nasty
manner.
[Editor's note: The Dismal Political Economist seems to have no problem criticizing in his typically nasty manner.]
[Editor's note: The Dismal Political Economist seems to have no problem criticizing in his typically nasty manner.]
No comments:
Post a Comment