The state of North
Carolina has been behind a bunch of other states that
have turned government control over to Republicans. But the Democratic party is pretty much
ideologically and intellectually bankrupt in the state, like it is in many
places and so in the 2012 elections the citizens of what was formerly a
progressive state gave Republicans complete control.
The results, catalogued
in Businessweek, have been predictable.
Since
January, Republicans in the General Assembly have introduced a series of bills
that would curtail the ability of Democratic-led cities and urban counties to
govern themselves. GOP legislators say Charlotte’s City Council can no longer
be trusted to manage Charlotte Douglas International Airport, a major hub. They
want an appointed regional authority to run it. “The Charlotte Airport
has become a multibillion-dollar effort,” says State Senator Bob Rucho, the
bill’s main sponsor. “We’re concerned and want to be sure you have the best
minds and most experienced individuals in place to move that forward to get the
most economic value derived from it.”
Photograph by Chuck Burton/AP Photo
|
Republicans say of course that they believe in local
government, that Washington
should not be telling states what to do and states should not be telling
localities what to do. But in the cities
of Charlotte , Raleigh
and Asheville
cities have been doing things that Republicans don’t like, such as voting for
someone else. So as soon as they gained
power in the Tar Heel state Republicans abandoned any pretense of their
beliefs.
State lawmakers
also nullified a lease that let Raleigh
use state property for a park and enacted changes limiting cities’ ability to
annex land. Another bill would take away control of school buildings and
construction from the Wake County Board of Education, which oversees schools in
Raleigh and
surrounding areas, and give it to county commissioners. “No one has come out to
say specifically ‘this is political revenge against Democratic strongholds,’ ” says David Swindell, who teaches
public policy at the University
of North Carolina at Charlotte . “But these changes amount to an
unprecedented attack on the state’s cities, which happen to be home to many of
the state’s Democrats.”
So what’s next on the
agenda? Why regressive
tax reform of course.
Senate leader Phil Berger, an Eden Republican, said the
forthcoming legislation would trim the personal income tax from the highest
7.75 percent rate to 4.5 percent over three years and cut the corporate income
tax from the current 6.9 percent to 6 percent.
The combined local and state sales tax would fall from 6.75
percent to 6.5 percent, but it would apply to hundreds of services currently
exempted, including prescription drugs. The food tax would increase from the
current 2 percent to the full sales tax rate, more than a three-fold increase.
The impact of course,
higher taxes for working families, lower taxes for wealthy families.
But a calculator sponsored by the N.C. Republican Party to
promote the plan found that a family of four making $30,000 a year with
standard deductions would pay $2,405 more in taxes each year. By contrast, a
single taxpayer making $100,000 would get a $1,886 tax cut.
The Democratic party
is partly to blame here, they have generally mediocre candidates and no
real organization. So the only way to
bring sanity back to North Carolina
is to allow the Republicans to go ahead and implement their programs. Only full exposure like that has a chance of
teaching voters a lesson about what Republicans really stand for, and who they
stand against.
Jindal attempted a similar sales tax plan in Louisiana, and this forum commented on the resulting backlash. Do NC Republicans have any reason to think that their sales tax plan will avoid a similar fate? Or are they just that arrogant?
ReplyDeleteThere's a fascinating exchange in the comments in your linked News Observer article about the NC GOP tax plan. One commenter, named polifrog, is hardline supply-sider who is utterly convinced that cutting corporate taxes will reduce costs for everyone:
ReplyDelete"When input prices fall end prices always fall.
That is the way the free market works. Only a dolt or the miseducated would deny this."
The comments are littered with statements like this by polifrog, and then rebuttals by a range of intelligent readers absolutely demolishing polifrog's argument. But like any faith-based conservative, polifrog keeps coming back with claims that those offering disagreement are stupid or uninformed.
There are two reasons why the plan in North Carolina has a better chance of passage than the one in Louisiana
ReplyDelete1. In North Carolina the plan was produced by the legislature, which has total Republican control whereas in Louisiana the plan was proposed by the Governor who has less influence.
2. In Louisiana the plan was to totally abolish the state income tax whereas in North Carolina it would only be reduced. This allow for a much more 'stealth' approach, one that will sneak up on the public after it is passed.