Hidden in the
hysteria over the Wisconsin recall election was the
rejection in California of a $1 a pack increase in the cigarette tax. This public initiative initially enjoyed huge
support, but then . . .
Tobacco companies
poured nearly $47 million into their campaign to defeat Proposition 29, a tax
designed to raise an estimated $860 million a year for research on
tobacco-related diseases and prevention programs. . . . .
Backed by the tobacco money, a coalition of anti-tax and business organizations mounted an aggressive campaign against the initiative, including a flood of television commercials and campaign mailers. The proposition, they argued, would create an unaccountable bureaucracy and allow the tax dollars to be siphoned out of
Proposition 29 (Cigarette tax)
Name | Votes | Pct. | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | 1,894,871 | 49.2% | |
No | 1,958,047 | 50.8% |
What was lost in California
was the health of many of its citizens along with the lower health care costs
for everyone else.
The
American Cancer Society and other proponents predicted that the
increase in cigarette prices would stop 220,000 kids from starting to smoke and
encourage 100,000 current smokers to quit. They raised more than $11 million,
including $500,000 from New York Mayor Michael Bloombergand $1.5 million from
cycling champ Lance Armstrong's Livestrong Foundation
Now this Forum is
highly skeptical of numbers like those put out by the American Cancer
Society, in large part because estimates of the impact of higher tobacco taxes
are just that, estimates. These groups also are not unbiased, providing further questions about their numbers. But there is
no question that higher cigarette prices reduced smoking to some degree, just
like there is not question that cigarette smoking causes heart disease, lung
cancer and a whole bunch of other bad things.
One can easily
imagine the high fives that tobacco executives everywhere were hoisting
after the election. And the price tag,
$50 million or so was a bargain for companies making profits in the billions
off of cigarette smoking. And the
anti-tax people also must be very proud, they not only denied funding for a
government program to help treat and prevent tobacco related diseases they also
enabled the citizens of California to be able to spend more money on tobacco and
strengthen the freedom of cigarette smokers to impose their second hand smoke
and higher health care costs on the rest of us.
What a great day for
the forces of greed and ignorance and selfishness!
No comments:
Post a Comment