It’s been a bad week
or two recently, particularly in Washington . The Secret Service utterly disgraced
themselves and the country with their behavior in Columbia while accompanying and supposedly
protecting the President. U. S.
troops in a war zone were shown posing with body parts. The GSA which is the government agency that
is supposed to effectively manage government operations was shown to be out of
control, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a conference that was a
total waste of money.
So it was with some
trepidation that we approached Washington Post’s usually inane and
irrelevant and misleading columnist
George Will and his commentary on whether or not sentencing juveniles to
life imprisonment without possibility of parole was cruel and unusual
punishment. The expectation was that Mr.
Will would not only endorse the policy, but want to bring back the death
penalty for young teens.
So imagine everyone’s
surprise when Mr. Will came out on the side that such a practice was likely
to be a violation of the Constitution’s prohibition against cruel and unusual
punishment.
Denying juveniles even
a chance for parole defeats the penal objective of rehabilitation. It
deprives prisoners of the incentive to reform themselves. Some prisons withhold
education, counseling and other rehabilitation programs from prisoners
ineligible for parole. Denying these to adolescents in a period of life crucial
to social and psychological growth stunts what the court in 2005 called the
prisoner’s “potential to attain a mature understanding of his own humanity.”
Which seems, in a word — actually, three words — “cruel and unusual.”
Wow, that was unexpected. But it is highly welcomed in a week that
otherwise is best forgotten, a week no one hopes to see again.
No comments:
Post a Comment