How Can Any Publication Print His Lies and Distortions?
In
a column in the Sunday NYT the headlines of Ross Douthat’s commentary is “The
Missiles of August”. This leads one to
think it will be about the dreadful Trump rhetoric on
North Korea,
but instead its about John Kennedy and how he dealt with the Cuban missile
crisis, which incidentally happened in October, not August.
Mr. Douthat says so many things that are either not true or
distorted that it is difficult to know where to begin. For instance, there is this.
In reality, the Cuban
missile crisis was the kind of scenario many of us feared could follow the
election of Donald Trump: An inexperienced president gets elected on promises
of toughness and flagrant lies, makes a series of bad decisions that provoke
escalation from our foes, at which point political considerations make him feel
he can’t back down, and suddenly we’re staring at nuclear war.
Let’s start with inexperienced President. Kennedy had been in Congress for six years,
and was then elected to the Senate where he served for eight years. Not exactly in-experienced was he? Trump of course ducked out of serving in the
military and had no prior experience at any level of government before become
President.
Ok, what about this?
. . . he went ahead with a plan
to place Jupiter missiles in Turkey,
a provocative gesture that made the Soviets suspect that we were looking for
opportunities for a nuclear first strike.
No, the missiles were obsolete and Kennedy planned to remove
them. Don’t you just hate it when facts
get in the way of a good argument.
Well there is this.
Kennedy decided that while
the missiles did not place the United States
in greater military danger (a nuke is a nuke whether fired from Havana, Russia
or a submarine off the U.S.
coast), they created an unacceptable political problem for his presidential
credibility. Thus the escalation that followed — the quarantine, the invasion
threat, the nuclear brinksmanship.
Oh, so the Cuban missile crisis was just a political
event. No one worried that the missiles
were 90 miles away? No one believes this
drivel except Douthat.
Wait, there’s more.
There are ways in which
Donald Trump is a kind of Dorian Gray’s portrait of J.F.K. — with the same
appetitiveness and clannishness (swap Ivanka for R.F.K.) and personal
secrets (tax returns for Trump, medical
records for Kennedy), but without the youthful looks and
eloquence and a patina of intellectualism and idealism to clean those failings
up.
Gosh, where to start?
Kennedy’s medical history did not affect his Presidency and not
releasing info was consistent with practices at the time. Trump’s tax return reflect his business
dealings which affect his Presidency, and releasing them is consistent with
long held practices.
And really, Ivanka is equivalent to Robert Kennedy? An empty headed spoiled rich girl vs one of
the towering figures of his time. C’mon
man!
Incredibly,
Peggy Noonan the sycophantic opinion writer for the WSJ has it right on JFK and the Cuban crisis.
What
is happening with North
Korea is not analogous to what happened in
1962, except for the word crisis. . . .
President
Kennedy gave great and grave attention to reassuring a nation and world
understandably alarmed by nuclear brinkmanship. Does Mr. Trump? Not in the
least. . . . .
In
that area, at least, there are useful lessons to be drawn from ’62. In that
crisis, Kennedy was verbally careful. He never popped off, because he knew
words had power and how they will be received is not always perfectly
calculable. He knew he could not use language—fire and fury—that invited
thoughts of nuclear war. . . .
JFK
himself called the publisher of the New York Times , the
president of the Washington Post and the owner of Time magazine to request
pledges of cooperation and discretion. All agreed. He filled in his Republican
predecessor, Dwight Eisenhower, on the plan to blockade Cuba. “Whatever
you do,” said Eisenhower, “you will have my support.”
Before his Oval Office
speech announcing the blockade, JFK briefed congressional leaders of both
parties with complete confidence. Military aircraft were sent for some of them.
And this garbage that somehow Ivanka is RFK? Here’s what Noonan, the hard right Republican
says.
Ten
days into the crisis, the president asked his brother, Attorney General Robert
Kennedy, to meet privately with the Russian ambassador to the U.S., Anatoly
Dobrynin. The purpose was to make sure the Russians understood the gravity with
which the Americans were approaching their decisions; they didn’t want the U.S. position
misunderstood. Both men were tired, and Dobrynin at one point thought RFK was
near tears. The U.S.
military, he told the ambassador, was pressing hard to invade Cuba. The
president would have to agree if Khrushchev didn’t take the missiles out now.
Dobrynin said he didn’t know if the Politburo, deeply committed to its
position, would back down. They were both telling the truth and lying. RFK was
putting it all on the military, Dobrynin on the Politburo, but both were under
pressure.
It was a private,
high-stakes meeting held, successfully, in secret. Notes were not leaked.
Could any of this happen
now?
Seriously, can anyone, anyone at all imagine Ivanka in such
a meeting. About all she could
contribute is how her new fall line might be endangered if nuclear war
broke out.