But Look Out – Evisceration of Civil Rights and Voting
Rights is Coming to a Supreme Court Near You
This Forum has often
castigated Supreme Court Justice Scalia, but he has written the majority
opinion saying that no, Arizona
cannot demand proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. Federal law is clear here, the Feds say that
a person need only affirm that they are a citizen under penalty of perjury, and
federal law trumps state law.
Justice Scalia
writing for a majority in the Supreme Court said, no, federal
law governs the requirements for elections and federal law does not allow state
laws to make onerous conditions for voting.
Here is a bunch of legalese which says Arizona cannot pre-empt federal law.
The power the Elections Clause confers is
none other than the power to pre-empt. Because Congress, when it acts under
this Clause, is always on notice that its legislation will displace some
element of a pre-existing legal regime erected by the States, the reasonable
assumption is that the text of Elections Clause legislation accurately
communicates the scope of Congress’s pre-emptive intent.
But before the celebrations begin everyone should
know that the Supreme Court is soon to rule on whether or not colleges can take
race into account in admissions, and whether or not the Voting Rights Act can
be used to ensure voting rights. The
almost certain conclusion is that the decisions will be ‘no’ and ‘no’. The Court will likely strike down the use of
any racial criteria in college admissions, (after all that is discrimination
against white people; historical discrimination against black people and its
lingering effects, never mind). The
Court will also likely strike down the key portions of the Voting Rights Act. After all Republicans must be given a free hand to rig elections so that the
minimum number of Democrats and minorities are represented, particularly if they cannot intimidate minority voters by demanding their papers.
No comments:
Post a Comment