Nobody likes paying
taxes, and every business that is taxed argues not that they don’t like
paying taxes, but that cutting their taxes will improve things for the industry
and the economy. And if those whose
taxes are cut have to suffer a financial gain, well that’s the price they are
willing to pay to advance their industry.
Almost no industry
has succeeded
like the small craft brewers that now inhabit every major American
city. And this success has come in spite
of difficult economic times, which make a $3.00 glass of beer
(indistinguishable in The Dismal Political Economist’s palate from a nice
frothy Pabst) a hard sell. But prosper
the industry has.
Now alcohol has always attracted the attention of
governments looking for tax revenues, for the simple economic reason that economists
call price inelasticity. Strip away the
academic pretentiousness and this means that alcohol can be taxed without a
large effect on consumption because people will pay the higher price. So this means revenue for governments, and
benefits for everyone when alcoholic consumption is reduced by the tax.
Riding Wave of Popularity, Craft Brewers Ask Congress for a Tax Cut
But the Craft Brewing industry wants a tax cut.
The Small BREW Act would reduce the tax on the first 60,000
barrels to $3.50. For every barrel beyond 60,000 but before two million, the
tax would be $16. After two million, breweries would pay the full $18 tax. Any
brewery that produces fewer than six million barrels a year — which includes
the bigger craft players, like the Boston Beer Company, maker of Samuel Adams, which turned out 2.7
million barrels last year — would be eligible for the tax reduction.
And of course they say it’s not for them, it’s for the
economy, for employment, for the children (ok maybe not for the children), for everybody else.
But really, it’s for them. That
why tax breaks exist, to benefit the people getting them. Give those industry folks a couple of glasses of their own product and they will readily admit it.
No comments:
Post a Comment