A part of the Paul
Ryan/Republican budget plan is to cut tax rates for the wealthy folks from
about 40% to 25%. Here’s what a
non-partisan tax think tank has
to say about it.
The tax
plan embedded in the House Republican budget would cut taxes by
$5.7 trillion over the next decade, with the benefits flowing
disproportionately to very wealthy households, according to a new analysis by
the nonpartisan Tax
Policy Center .
Taxpayers
earning more than $1 million a year would benefit the most from the GOP
tax plan, the analysis shows, reaping an average
$400,000 tax break that would send their after-tax income soaring by nearly 20
percent. . . .
Aides to Ryan and Ways and Means Chairman Dave
Camp (R-Mich.) did not immediately respond to the analysis.
No No No Republicans would say. They plan to ‘reform’ the tax system so that
revenues would be the same. How do they
plan to do this, we don’t know. They won’t
say.
The budget, drafted by House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan
(R-Wis.), proposes to make up the revenue lost to those changes through an
overhaul of the tax code that would eliminate existing tax breaks and
deductions.
But the budget leaves
those details to the House Ways
and Means Committee,
But that is what in the Dictionary of Realism is
called “pie in the sky”.
Urban Institute resident fellow Howard Gleckman questions whether
it is possible to replace all that cash.
“Could Ways &
Means find $5.7 trillion in tax preferences? It is hard to imagine,”
Gleckman writes, noting that such a large sum would require a 30 percent
reduction in existing tax breaks.
“Because the rate
cuts are so regressive,” Gleckman continues, “House Republicans would have to
heavily skew offsetting tax increases to high-income households if they want to
keep the distribution of taxes roughly what it is today. And that will be
another heavy lift.”
The good news in all this, the fiscal alchemy that is
Paul Ryan is finally beginning to be exposed.
And once it is maybe there can be a serious debate on taxes and tax
reform, something the rest of us want but also something Republicans will want
to avoid at all costs.
I would agree, except that Ryan's alchemy was already exposed in the presidential election. In fact, the nonsensical notion of cutting rates without sacrificing revenue probably got more attention in 2012 than it will until 2016. Yet here's Ryan peddling the same idea again.
ReplyDelete