One of the more
polemic writers in the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal is Daniel
Henninger. To write for the Journal
means there is no requirement for honesty in a discussion. The conclusions are what are important,
regardless of their validity, or in the case of Mr. Henninger and his most
recent screed, the lack of validity.
Mr. Henninger takes
the position of most right wing fanatics, that government spending must be
cut or else the entire country will collapse.
He
starts out with a totally erroneous statement.
There is general agreement on at least two
things about the current U.S.
economy. It is emerging from the deepest recession since the Great Depression,
and its debt level is unsustainable.
No, there is not general agreement that the current debt
level is unsustainable. In fact other
than ideologically driven economists no one else is all that concerned about
the current debt level of the United
States . Willing lenders have driven the interest rates on U. S. debt to their lowest levels
ever.
But Mr. Henninger appeals to expertise, in this case
economist Alberto Alesina.
The
path back to stronger growth, argues Mr. Alesina, is a combination of
significant, permanent cuts in public spending and relatively small tax
increases, if any.
Gosh, that doesn’t sound right, and it is not, as
real world data shows. Here is what
Mr.
Alesina (speaking in the third person) said in 2010 response to criticism of his so-called
research into the issue.
A recent paper by Jayadem and Konzcal
[sic] (2010) argues that Alesina and Ardagna’s results do not apply to the
current situation because fiscal adjustments on the spending side are
expansionary only when they occur when the economy is already expanding. The
criticisms of that paper are at best overstated... In addition, what is unfolding currently in Europe directly contradicts Jayadev and Konczal. Several European countries have started
drastic plans of fiscal adjustment in the middle of a fragile recovery. At the
time of this writing, it appears that European speed of recovery is sustained,
faster than that of the U.S. ,
and the ECB has recently significantly raised growth forecasts for the Euro
area.
Well, 3 years later there is the empirical test of the above
words. They turned out to be totally,
completely, utterly fallacious.
Wrong. Incorrect. In error.
But why then would a writer of opinion for the Wall Street
Journal choose Mr. Alesina as his authority?
The obvious answer, there is no real, legitimate authority that supports
his view, so a bogus expert is the only alternative.
No comments:
Post a Comment