The vitriol that the top
1% or top 5% or top whatever percent have for Mr. Obama just doesn’t make
sense. To listen to them one would think
that the first term of Mr. Obama was just devastating. But as this post from
Paul Caron’s excellent Tax Prof Blog shows, they very wealthy have done
very well.
NY Times: Incomes Flat in Recovery, but Not for the 1%
New York
Times: Incomes
Flat in Recovery, but Not for the 1%:
Incomes rose more than
11% for the top 1% of earners during the economic recovery, but not at all for
everybody else, according to new data. The numbers, produced by Emmanuel Saez,
an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, show overall income
growing by just 1.7% over the period. But there was a wide gap between the top
1%, whose earnings rose by 11.2%, and the other 99%, whose earnings declined by
0.4%. [Striking
It Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Updated with 2011
estimates)]
(Hat Tip: Mike Talbert.)
So one can only conclude that the animosity of the
extremely wealthy in this nation is totally unfounded. Which leads to just
another mystery. How can people this
stupid, this unaware of their own self interests be this rich? It can’t be that all of them inherited their
money can it?
No comments:
Post a Comment