tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588709444841156892.post1916544412718334460..comments2023-09-27T05:07:57.139-04:00Comments on The Dismal Political Economist: Revisiting Griswold v. Connecticut – Because Its Statement of Freedom is Something That Seems to be Forgotten – Particularly by Mr. SantorumDavid Ricardohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03733100135827552933noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588709444841156892.post-57438630503436482322012-02-21T14:14:37.674-05:002012-02-21T14:14:37.674-05:00Good writeup. Griswold vs CT was a 7-2 decision. J...Good writeup. Griswold vs CT was a 7-2 decision. Justice Stewart in fact called the law 'uncommonly silly' but constitutional. He changed his mind on the right to privacy 8 years later on Roe v Wade. No one talks about that.<br /><br />The Supreme Court protects Americans from populist State legislatures that want to attack the liberties of minorities to score political points with the majority. If Santorum is given the power to nominate judges, women, gays, Latinos, blacks and Muslims will attacked in every Red State.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588709444841156892.post-9489009498394501022012-02-19T00:52:02.545-05:002012-02-19T00:52:02.545-05:00I wish Douglas had just argued that his decision w...I wish Douglas had just argued that his decision was necessary given "Boyd," and left his "penumbrations" in the garbage canJohn Haskellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08341430524377582352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588709444841156892.post-59213549046731365802012-02-18T13:48:58.278-05:002012-02-18T13:48:58.278-05:00Excellent, TDPE! As usual, you so simply and with...Excellent, TDPE! As usual, you so simply and with precision, render a cause, a belief, a movement, of those who state, with almost religions fervor, their reverence for the constitution, to be but, the vile, contradictory selfish motive it really is.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com